• Users Online: 67
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 57-61

Effect of tranexamic acid on the treatment of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A double-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial


1 Infectious Diseases Research Center, Health Institute; Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
2 Clinical Research Development Center, Imam Reza Hospital, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
3 Infectious Diseases Research Center, Health Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran

Date of Submission07-Jul-2020
Date of Decision15-Mar-2021
Date of Acceptance20-Mar-2021
Date of Web Publication29-Mar-2021

Correspondence Address:
Arezoo Bozorgomid
Infectious Diseases Research Center, Health Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: This study received financial support from Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Iran (Grant Number. 97101), Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2221-6189.312153

Get Permissions

  Abstract 

Objective: To determine the efficacy of tranexamic acid (TXA) in the management of acute upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding.
Methods: A total of 70 patients with acute upper GI bleeding were included in this double-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial from September 2018 to December 2018. Patients were divided into the control group (received fluid therapy and intravenous infusion of pantoprazole, 35 cases) and the TXA group (received intravenous TXA besides the treatment of control group, 35 cases). Rebleeding, admission duration, and need for blood transfusion were compared between the two groups.
Results: Fifteen patients (42.9%) in the TXA group and 10 patients (28.6%) in the control group stayed in hospital for more than 3 days during their admission (P=0.21). Rebleeding occurred in 8 patients (22.9%) and 5 patients (14.3%) of the TXA group and the control group, respectively (P=0.35). More patients in the TXA group (21 cases, 60%) received blood transfusion than the control group (8 cases, 22.9%) (P=0.02).
Conclusions: TXA did not improve the outcome of patients with acute upper GI bleeding.

Keywords: Tranexamic acid; Gastrointestinal bleeding; Emergent; Treatment


How to cite this article:
Bashiri H, Hamzeii M, Bozorgomid A. Effect of tranexamic acid on the treatment of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A double-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial. J Acute Dis 2021;10:57-61

How to cite this URL:
Bashiri H, Hamzeii M, Bozorgomid A. Effect of tranexamic acid on the treatment of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A double-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial. J Acute Dis [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Apr 12];10:57-61. Available from: http://www.jadweb.org/text.asp?2021/10/2/57/312153


  1. Introduction Top


The gastrointestinal (GI) system is divided into upper GI and lower GI tracts. The upper GI tract begins from the mouth and continues through the second part of the duodenum (the ligament of Treitz). Acute GI bleeding is one of the most common medical emergencies and is one of the most common causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide[1]. GI bleeding could be obvious or occult. Obvious GI hemorrhage can be seen in disorders such as hematemesis, melena, and hematochezia. Acute upper GI bleeding has a higher prevalence than lower tract GI bleeding by 4 to 5 times[2]. The most common causes of acute upper GI bleeding in developed countries are peptic ulcers and esophageal varices[3],[4]. A major predictor of death in GI bleeding is rebleeding, occurring in 10% of non-variceal bleeding patients[5].

Endoscopic procedures along with pharmacologic therapies are used for the management of acute upper GI bleeding. Pharmacologic agents used in such patients include proton-pump inhibitor agents, H2-blockers, somatostatin analogues, and tranexamic acid (TXA)[6]. TXA is a synthetic lysine analogue, which is bound to plasminogen and plasmin and blocks their ability to bind the remaining lysine in fibrin, and therefore prevents fibrinolysis[7]. TXA can reduce upper GI bleeding and help to stabilize the patients’ condition before endoscopic treatments[8]. The evidence regarding the TXA effect indicates its efficacy in decreasing hemorrhage during operations and bleeding due to traumatic injuries. TXA is prohibited in patients with previous allergic reactions to TXA, renal failure, active hematuria, and neurologic disturbances including seizures[9]. TXA can also decrease the mortality of GI bleeding patients[10]. With this background in mind, we decided to determine the efficacy of TXA in patients with acute upper GI bleeding.


  2. Patients and methods Top


2.1. Study participants

This was a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial. The study was carried out in patients with the diagnosis of upper GI bleeding referred to the emergency department at Imam Reza Hospital, Kermanshah, Iran from September 2018 to December 2018. We excluded patients with age <18 years, contraindications to receiving TXA, kidney disorders, pregnant or lactating women, esophageal or gastric varices, coagulation disorders, and severe liver disease. To establish the diagnosis of upper GI bleeding, all patients underwent endoscopy during the first 24 hours of admission. In case of other diagnoses during endoscopy except for upper GI bleeding, the patient was excluded.

2.2. Ethical approval

Informed consent was obtained from the patients. This study was performed in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences (approval number: IR.KUMS.REC.1397.97101). The study was registered at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (www.irct.ir) as IRCT20130812014333N92.

2.3. Sample size

Considering confidence of 95% and power of 90%, the sample size was calculated (using the following formula) as 29 patients in each group[11]. Based on this sample size, 35 patients were included in each group.



μ1: The first population mean; μ2: The second population mean; σ: Standard deviation; α: Type I error; Type II error; Z: Confidence level; 1-β: Power; σ12: First population variance; σ22: Second population variance; N: Sample size.

2.4. Study design

The patients were randomly divided into two groups by emergency department nursing staff who were blinded to the study. The control group received conventional treatments for upper GI bleeding including fluid therapy and pantoprazole infusion. In the TXA group, besides conventional treatments, TXA was injected stat and then intravenous infusion of TXA (1 g/8 h) was administered. Individual information was gathered from medical records and clinical examinations of the patients during admission. The outcomes of the study were hospital length of stay, the need for endoscopy and blood transfusion, and rebleeding. The patients were followed up for 1 month.

2.5. Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were conducted using the statistical software SPSS version 16.0 for windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Continuous variables were presented as mean±standard deviation (SD), and descriptive data were expressed as frequency and percentage. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was performed to evaluate the normal distribution of the data in each group. Independent-samples Student’s t-test was used to assess the between-group comparisons. Categorical variables were compared using the Chi-square test. The significant level of this study was set at α=0.05.


  3. Results Top


The flowchart of our study population is shown in [Figure 1]. As it shows in [Figure 1], 9 of 79 assessed patients with acute upper GI bleeding were excluded from the study for various reasons. Ultimately, 49 men (70%) and 21 women (30%) were assigned to the study. The mean age of the study population was (54.34±11.79) years. The most common causes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding was gastric erosion (28 cases, 40%), followed by gastric ulcer (18 cases, 25.7%), duodenal erosion (13 cases, 18.6%), duodenal ulcer (11 cases, 15.7%). Forty-seven patients (67.1%) presented with melena and others (23 cases, 32.9%) had hematemesis. A total of 70 patients with acute upper GI bleeding were randomly divided into 2 groups, including 35 patients in the TXA group and 35 subjects in the control group. There was no statistical difference between groups in baseline characteristics (P>0.05), so the groups were comparable. The patient’s characteristics are described in [Table 1].
Figure 1: Flowchart of the allocation, follow-up and analysis of this clinical trial.

Click here to view
Table 1: Baseline characteristics and clinical data of the study’s population.

Click here to view


In [Table 2], a comparison of admission duration, rebleeding, and need for endoscopy or blood transfusion in the two studied groups are presented. No statistically significant difference was observed regarding admission duration, rebleeding, and need for endoscopy between the two groups [Table 2]. It is worth noting that the need for blood transfusion in the TXA group was significantly higher than that in the control groups (P=0.00). None of the patients required surgical intervention.
Table 2: Comparison of length of stay, rebleeding, blood transfusion, and endoscopic intervention [n (%)].

Click here to view



  4. Discussion Top


GI bleeding remains a major global cause of morbidity and mortality. The initial treatment of upper GI bleeding starts with stopping the bleeding and preventing further bleeding. TXA is an antifibrinolytic agent via inhibition of plasminogen activation and is widely used for surgical bleeding. Some studies suggested that TXA is effective for upper GI bleeding management[12],[13]. In the present study, TXA did not improve the outcome of patients with bleeding ulcers. Moreover, 60.0% of the patients in the TXA group versus 22.9% of the patients in the control group required blood transfusion during GI bleeding, which was an unexpected finding. Similarly, Tavakoli et al. conducted a study to investigate the efficacy of TXA in treating upper GI bleeding[14]. In this double-blind randomized clinical trial, 410 patients were included, and TXA was compared to placebo. There was no significant difference in bleeding, mortality due to bleeding, need for surgery, and need for blood transfusion between the two groups. In 2015, an evidence-based study was conducted in Indonesia to evaluate the therapeutic effect of TXA in patients with upper GI bleeding. The results showed that TXA injection had no significant effect on the outcome of the patients[15].

Furthermore, Karadaş et al.[16] found that locally administered single-dose TXA conferred no additional benefits over standard care in patients with upper GI bleeding. Contrary to our study, a double-blind study in patients with severe upper GI bleeding was done to determine the effect of TXA[17]. The authors found a significant reduction in the need for blood transfusion in patients who received TXA. In a study by Rafeey et al.[18] the rate of rebleeding was 11.4% in subjects who received topical TXA via endoscopic procedures, which was lower than the control group.

In a study conducted by Patchett et al.[19] found that gastric juice accelerated GI bleeding both by defective clot formation and by contributing to the lysis of a formed fibrin clot. The authors suggested that acid-dependent factors such as gastric protease were associated with defective clot formation. Thus, although TXA competitively inhibits the activation of plasminogen to plasmin, it has no activity against acid-dependant proteases that are responsible for significant fibrinolysis in patients with upper GI bleeding.

In the study of Karadaş et al.[16] the patients with upper GI hemorrhage were administrated with a single 2 000 mg dose of TXA, and no significant changes were observed in mortality, rebleeding, the need for any intervention, and recurrent admission to the emergency department. Similarly, Smith et al.[20] reported that TXA does not appear to decrease blood loss and improve clinical outcomes when used for low GI hemorrhage.

Chertoff et al.[21] reported that the utilization rate of TXA was low by both surgical and medical intensivists to treat patients with acute upper GI bleeding. Furthermore, guidelines do not recommend the use of TXA in patients with acute upper GI bleeding because of its unclear activity[22]. For this reason, the effectiveness of TXA (1 g, followed by 3 g over 24 h) versus blinded placebo for GI bleeding is being evaluated in a clinical trial named HALT-IT, aiming at recruiting 12 009 adult patients between July 4, 2013, and June 21, 2019[23]. Based on the clinical trial results, TXA did not reduce death but is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolic events and seizures. A few studies have investigated the effects of TXA toxicity in vivo and/or in vitro, and the results are usually contradictory[24],[25]. Therefore, further studies are required to confirm the safety of TXA before it can be recommended for standard treatment.


  5. Conclusions Top


Our study was conducted in 2018 when there were a small number of studies in this regard and to our knowledge. The results showed that there is still a long way before a basic conclusion can be achieved on the efficacy of TXA for GI bleeding management. Therefore, future research should be conducted since choosing an appropriate treatment for upper GI hemorrhage patients is not an easy question to be answered by trial and error.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Clinical Development Research Center of Imam Reza Hospital affiliated to Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran for their kind support.

Funding

This study received financial support from Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Iran (Grant Number. 97101).

Authors’ contributions

H.B.: Study concept and design; H.B. and M.H.: Acquisition of data; A.B.: Analysis and interpretation of data; A.B. and H.B.: Drafting of the manuscript, critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; H.B. and M.H.: Administrative, technical, and material support; H.B.: Study supervision.

 
  References Top

1.
Button LA, Roberts SE, Evans PA, Goldacre MJ, Akbari A, Dsilva R, et al. Hospitalized incidence and case fatality for upper gastrointestinal bleeding from 1999 to 2007: a record linkage study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011; 33(1): 64-76.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Amin SK, Antunes C. Lower gastrointestinal bleeding. [Online] Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK448126/. [Accessed on July 19 2020].  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Ugiagbe RA, Omuemu CE. Etiology of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the University of Benin Teaching Hospital, South-Southern Nigeria. Niger J Surg Sci 2016; 26(2): 29-32.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Yousefinejad V, Darvishi N, Taheri A, Babahajian A, Ghafory H, Manoochehri F, et al. Evaluation of demographic and behavioral characteristics of patients using non-steroidal, anti-inflammatory and combinatory drugs related with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. SJKU 2017; 22(4): 18-26.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Stanworth SJ. Use of tranexamic acid in gastrointestinal bleeding and patients with haematological malignancies. ANZ J Surg 2020; 90(4): 424-425.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Jiang M, Chen P, Gao Q. Systematic review and net-work meta-analysis of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage interventions. Cell Physiol Biochem 2016; 39(6): 2477-2491.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Wu G, Mazzitelli BA, Quek AJ, Veldman MJ, Conroy PJ, Caradoc-Davies TT, et al. Tranexamic acid is an active site inhibitor of urokinase plasminogen activator. Blood Adv 2019; 3(5): 729-733.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Burke E, Harkins P, Ahmed I. Is there a role for tranexamic acid in upper GI bleeding? a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Res Pract 2021;2021: 8876991.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Roberts I, Coats T, Edwards P, Gilmore I, Jairath V, Ker K, et al. HALT-IT-tranexamic acid for the treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2014; 15: 450.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Bennett C, Klingenberg SL, Langholz E, Gluud LL. Tranexamic acid for upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 2014(11): CD006640.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Sabovic M, Lavre J, Vujkovac B. Tranexamic acid is beneficial as adjunctive therapy in treating major upper gastrointestinal bleeding in dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003; 18(7): 1388-1391.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Jiang M, Chen P, Gao Q. Systematic review and net-work meta-analysis of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage interventions. Cell Physiol Biochem 2016; 39(6): 2477-2491.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Stollings JL, Landsperger JS, Semler MW, Rice TW. Tranexamic acid for refractory gastrointestinal bleeds: a cohort study. J Crit Care 2018; 43: 128-132.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Tavakoli N, Mokhtare M, Agah S, Azizi A, Masoodi M, Amiri H, et al. Comparison of the efficacy of intravenous tranexamic acid with and without topical administration versus placebo in urgent endoscopy rate for acute gastrointestinal bleeding: A double-blind randomized controlled trial. United European Gastroenterol J 2018; 6(1): 46-54.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Atikah N, Singh G, Maulahela H, Cahyanur R. Tranexamic acid in the management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: an evidence-based case report. Acta Med Indones 2015; 47(2): 172-175.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Karadaş A, Doğan NÖ, Pinar SG, Yeşil O, Pekdemir M, Yilmaz S, et al. A randomized controlled trial of the effects of local tranexamic acid on mortality, rebleeding, and recurrent endoscopy need in patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 32(1): 26-31.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Engqvist A, Broström O, von Feilitzen F, Halldin M, Nyström B, Ost A, et al. Tranexamic acid in massive haemorrhage from the upper gastrointestinal tract: a double-blind study. Scand J Gastroenterol 1979;14(7): 839-844.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Rafeey M, Shoaran M, Ghergherechi R. Topical tranexamic acid as a novel treatment for bleeding peptic ulcer: A randomised controlled trial. Afr J Paediatr Surg 2016; 13(1): 9-13.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Patchett SE, Enright H, Afdhal N, O’Connell W, O’Donoghue DP. Clot lysis by gastric juice: an in vitro study. Gut 1989; 30(12): 1704-1707.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Smith SR, Murray D, Pockney PG, Bendinelli C, Draganic BD, Carroll R. Tranexamic acid for lower GI hemorrhage: a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2018; 61(1): 99-106.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Chertoff J, Lowther G, Alnuaimat H, Ataya A. The use of tranexamic acid for upper gastrointestinal bleeding by medical and surgical intensivists: a single center experience. Gastroenterology Res 2017; 10(4): 235-237.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Siau K, Chapman W, Sharma N, Tripathi D, Iqbal T, Bhala N. Management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: an update for the general physician. J R Coll Physicians Edinb 2017; 47(3): 218-230.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
HALT-IT Trial Collaborators. Effects of a high-dose 24-h infusion of tranexamic acid on death and thromboembolic events in patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding (HALT-IT): an international randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2020; 395(10241): 1927-1936.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
McLean M, McCall K, Smith IDM, Blyth M, Kitson SM, Crowe LAN, et al, Tranexamic acid toxicity in human periarticular tissues. Bone Joint Res 2019; 8(1): 11-18.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Poeran J, Rasul R, Suzuki S, Danninger T, Mazumdar M, Opperer M, et al. Tranexamic acid use and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty in the United States: retrospective analysis of effectiveness and safety. BMJ 2014; 349: g4829.  Back to cited text no. 25
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Patients and ...
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed390    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded60    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal