• Users Online: 227
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 202-207

Drug dependence and its risk factors in emergency department patients: A retrospective cross-sectional study


1 Department of Emergency Medicine, Adiyaman University Medical Faculty, Adiyaman, Turkey
2 Department of Neurology, Adiyaman University Medical Faculty, Adiyaman, Turkey

Date of Submission12-May-2021
Date of Decision26-Jul-2021
Date of Acceptance14-Aug-2021
Date of Web Publication05-Oct-2021

Correspondence Address:
Umut Gulacti
Department of Emergency Medicine, Adiyaman University Medical Faculty, Adiyaman
Turkey
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2221-6189.326910

Get Permissions

  Abstract 

Objective: To determine the characteristics and risk factors of drug dependence among patients who were administered drugs with addictive potential (DAP) in an emergency department (ED).
Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included patients who were administered DAP 3 or more times in the emergency room between September 1, 2019 and March 1, 2020. The demographic and baseline information were recorded. All the prescibed DAP, the reasons to use these drugs, secondary drug dependence, the department where DAP were first prescribed, types of doctors who preferred to prescribed DAP, and the risk factors for the development of drug dependence were determined.
Results: A total of 3 000 patients were screened from medical records, and among them, 80 patients developed drug dependence. Drug dependence only developed for tramadol (n=57, 71.3%), diazepam (n=11, 13.8%), and biperiden (n=12, 15.0%). Tramadol was the most frequently prescribed drug (n=57, 71.3%). The most common reason for drug dependence was psychiatric disorders (n=29, 36.3%). Drug dependence developed in renal colic patients due to the administration of tramadol (n=7, 100%). On the contrary, dependence to biperiden were mainly developed in patients with psychiatric complaints (n=12, 41.4%). The rate of secondary drug dependence was 15% (n=12). Of the Biperiden users, 41.7% developed secondary drug dependence on diazepam. Most DAP were first prescribed in the ED (n=52, 65%), and the specialist preferred to prescribe DAP (n=43, 53.8%). For the development of dependence, the presence of renal colic (OR: 3.387, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.473-7.788, P=0.004) and low back pain (OR: 5.778, 95% CI: 2.779-12.014, P<0.001) were the risk factors.
Conclusions: Most DAP were first prescribed in the ED compared to other departments, and specialist are preferred to use DAP. Tramadol is the most commonly used drugs caused drug dependence. Psychiatric disorder patients are easier to develope drug dependence. Furthermore, renal colic and low back pain patients needs more attention to avert drug dependence.

Keywords: Drug with addictive portential; Drug dependence; Emergency room; Risk


How to cite this article:
Yavuz E, Turgut K, Gulacti U, Lok U, Altunisik E. Drug dependence and its risk factors in emergency department patients: A retrospective cross-sectional study. J Acute Dis 2021;10:202-7

How to cite this URL:
Yavuz E, Turgut K, Gulacti U, Lok U, Altunisik E. Drug dependence and its risk factors in emergency department patients: A retrospective cross-sectional study. J Acute Dis [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Oct 19];10:202-7. Available from: http://www.jadweb.org/text.asp?2021/10/5/202/326910


  1. Introduction Top


Drug dependence is an important global problem in terms of socioeconomic and public health[1],[2],[3],[4],[5]. In the United States of America, more than 841 000 people died of drug overdose since 1999, and opioid-related issues was occupied more than 70% of drug overdose deaths in 2019[3]. Besides, there is a quite high proportion of repeated admission to the hospital among these cases.



Measures to control highly drugs with addictive potential (DAP) vary among countries. Narcotic drugs include antipsychotics, sedatives, and opiate analgesics that are subject to a special prescription due to their high addictive levels. This constitutes a group of drugs for which the use and disposal information should be monitored by the World Health Organization. In addition, the records of highly DAP are regularly kept in a separate file outside the hospital registry system in many countries to combat substance abuse[4],[5].

Although the use of highly DAP in the emergency department (ED) is very beneficial, there are also certain drawbacks, such as dependence and abuse. Besides, the use of this group of drugs at very high doses can cause undesirable side effects. From this drug group, sedo-analgesics are often used in the presence of extremely painful conditions, epileptic seizures, and the requirement of rapid sequence intubation in the ED. However, the use of these drugs at a high dose and frequency increases the number of repeated presentations to the hospital[6]. Drug dependence originating from the ED can increase the risk of violence, workload loss, and hospital costs[5],[7].

Besides, the easy access to highly DAP of drug-dependent patients in the ED and the administration of these drugs in this clinical setting can also develop a predisposition to dependence[8]. Furthermore, drug-dependent patients that are not given the drugs they ever administered often resort to violence. Thus, developing effective ED interventions for drug abuse requires a clear understanding of the characteristics of patients presenting to this healthcare setting[9].

In this study, we aimed to determine the characteristics and risk factors of drug dependence among the patients who were administered DAP in an emergency department.


  2. Patients and methods Top


2.1. Study design

This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at Adiyaman University Training and Research Hospital with an average of 25 000 presentations per month. All presentations over 6 months between September 1, 2019, and March 1, 2020, for the administration of DAP were recorded.

2.2. Ethical approval

The study was initiated after the approval of the Ethics Committee of the Adiyaman University (approval number: 2019-6-1) and conducted according to STROBE (Observational studies in epidemiology) statement.

2.3. Patients

All patients over the age of 18 years who were given DAP in the ED were included in the study. Patients who do not develop dependence and do not take 3 or more drugs with incomplete medical data were excluded from the study. The presentation dates, administered drugs, and diagnoses of the patients were examined and recorded daily. Thus, the frequency of the same patient visiting the ED for the same purpose was obtained. To determine whether the administered drug was addictive, a more detailed archive search was performed for the same six-month period among the patients who were given three or more of the same drugs that could have drug dependence potential. Furthermore, all the medical data of these patients over the last eight years were obtained from hospital records and examined. During this examination, first, the department at which DAP were administered was identified, and then these patients’ total number of presentations to the ED and other services of the hospital was recorded. Based on the eight-year data, the underlying causes of drug dependence, whether these patients had a chronic disease, the frequence of complaints, the diagnosis for which DAP was administered, and whether the patients had any previous dependence were determined.

2.4. Definitions

Drug dependence was defined as use of an DAP 3 or more times.

2.5. Outcome measures

The primary outcome measure was the all the used DAP, the underlying reasons to use these drugs, and the risk factors of drug dependence. The secondary outcome measures include secondary drug dependence, the department where the DAP were first used, types of doctors who preferred to use DAP.

2.6. Statistical analysis

The variables were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (version 17.0 software, SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA). Numerical variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Categorical variables were expressed as numbers and percentages. Distribution differences for categorical variables were evaluated using the Chi-squared test. Determining the best predictors that affect drug dependency was evaluated by multiple logistic regression analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) was used for expressing the study data. The significant level of this study was set at α<0.05.


  3. Results Top


During the study period, 3 000 patients administered DAP were screened. As a result, a total of 80 patients were included in the study [Figure 1].
Figure 1: The study flowchart. DAP: Drugs with addictive portential.

Click here to view


Of the patients included in the study, 52 (65%) were male. The mean age of the patients was (49.9±19.6) years. DAP were determined as tramadol (n=57, 71.3%), diazepam (n=11, 13.8%), and Biperiden (n=12, 15%). No patient who received procedural sedation developed drug dependence. Specialist preferred to use DAP (n=43, 53.8%) [Table 1].
Table 1: Gender, administered drugs, and doctors who made the presciption.

Click here to view


Based on the detailed histories and complaints of each patients, it was seen that the most common reason for the presentation was psychiatric disorders (29, 36.3%), and followed by malignancy (16, 20%), low back pain (10, 12.5%), abdominal pain (8, 10%), renal colic (7, 8.8%), neurological disorders (4, 5%), other (4, 5%), myalgia (1, 1.3%), and fracture-dislocation (1, 1.3%) [Table 2].
Table 2: Underlying reasons of drug dependence, secondary drug dependence, and department where DAP were first prescribed.

Click here to view


The results shows that among patients with renal colic, all the drug dependence cases developed due to tramadol use (n=7, 100%). Of the patients with psychiatric complaints, 41.4% (n=12) became dependent on Biperiden. The rate of secondary drug dependence was 15% (n=12). Of the Biperiden users, 41.7% developed secondary drug dependence on diazepam. Additionally, the eight-year analysis revealed that, the most common clinical setting where the first DAP were used was the ED at a rate of 65% (n=52) [Table 2].

Multiple logistic regression analysis shows that renal colic and low back pain were the risk factors of drug dependence [Table 3].
Table 3: Risk factors for drug dependence.

Click here to view



  4. Discussion Top


In recent years, drug abuse among young people has been expanding. The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime states that the non-medical use of sedatives and tranquilizers is higher among men than women. This difference between the genders may be related to these drugs being easier to procure through unrecorded means among men[10],[11]. Many people admitted to obstetrics and gynecology, emergency department, oncology and surgery clinics may develop a substance use disorder due to commonly use of DAP in these departments. However, most DAP are first administered in the ED[4],[6],[8],[11],[12],[13]. Similarly, In our study, mostly DAP (65%) were first administered in the ED.

The use of highly DAP at repeated and high doses poses a higher risk of drug dependence among patients with cancer, those undergoing surgery, and psychiatric cases[12]. Christopher et al.[13] reported that 65% of patients were prescribed opioids immediately after spinal surgery, and 47% continued to abuse postoperative drugs. Opiate abuse is common after spinal surgery. A recent overall analysis found that at least one in five patients experiencing cancer-related pain might be at risk of non-medical drug abuse[14]. In our study, the rate of cancer diagnosis was quite high (n=16, 20%). Considering that cancer patients may undergo very painful episodes, there is a need for further studies to investigate whether the administration of opiate analgesics is a real necessity or an indication of dependence.

In a study conducted by Benjamin et al.[15] to evaluate opiate prescription among different doctors, it was found that general practitioners tended to prescribe this drug more often. In another study by Baldemir et al.[16], it was seen that 67.9% of the doctors were hesitated when prescribing opioids, and most of them avoided prescribing these drugs. When the authors further evaluated the data, they determined that the prejudices about opioids were not related to the title or experience of doctors. In our study, the drugs with high addictive potential were preferred by specialist (53.8%). This may be due to specialist seeing more chronic, complicated cases.

DAP are mostly used in the presence of repeated chronic pain, epileptic seizures, and the requirement of procedural sedation. Chronic repetitive high-dose applications have high addictive potential[17]. In contrast, the addictive level of a single-dose administration is low. In a previous study, more than half of regular opioid users reported back pain[18]. In our study, we found that the most common reasons for referral to highly DAP were psychiatric symptoms. None of the patients that received highly DAP in the ED for procedural sedation were administered this type of drug again within six months. Opiates and sedative agents are the drugs of choice in the ED for procedural sedation and acute cases. ED was identified as the clinical setting where most DAP had been first administered. This is probably due to the patients presenting to the ED more frequently and easily in Turkey, and it shows that their drug dependence may have therefore originated from the ED. A previous study also reported that ED physicians had similar concerns[16].

Referrring to the type of preferred DAP, opiates seem to be the most commonly abused drug. In a previous study, prescriptions of opiates in 2015 were found to be three times higher compared to that of 1999[19]. In our study, tramadol was most preferred drug in the ED.

In a study on secondary drug dependence, it was reported that the risk of opiate dependence was increased among the patients using benzodiazepine[20]. In our study, we observed secondary drug dependence mostly in the use of Biperiden and diazepam. This can be explained by the fact that physicians try to choose a different agent due to the risk of dependence or considering different diagnoses.

The issue regarding the risk factors for drug dependence remains controversial. In some studies, chronic pain (e.g., neck and low back pain), anxiety, tobacco and alcohol use, history of a substance use disorder, and postoperative opiate use have been defined as the independent risk factors[21],[22]. Sun et al.[20] stated that advanced age and male gender were risk factors for opiate abuse after surgery. In contrast, there are also studies arguing that drug dependence is more common in females[23].

Our study is a retrospective study with a small number of cases. The province in which we conducted the study is small and it is difficult to access drugs outside the medical setting. Patients who were administered the DAP for only a certain time interval (for a period of eight years) in the ED have been studied.

To sum up, most DAP are first used in the ED compared to other departments, and specialist are preferred to use additicve drugs. Tramadol is the most commonly used drugs caused drug dependence. Psychiatric disorder patients are easier to develope drug dependence. Furthermore, renal colic and low back pain patients needs more attention to avert drug dependence.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Authors’ contributions

E.Y., K.T., U.G., U.L., and E.A. developed the study concept; All authors contributed to the study design; Data collection were performed by E.Y.; U.G. performed the data analysis and interpretation, and drafted the manuscript under the supervision of U.G.; U.G., U.L., and K.T. provided critical revisions. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript for submission and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

 
  References Top

1.
Patel V, Chisholm D, Parikh R, Charlson FJ, Degenhardt L, Dua T, et al. Addressing the burden of mental, neurological, and substance use disorders: key messages from Disease Control Priorities, 3rd edition. Lancet 2016; 387(10028): 1672-1685.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Whiteford HA, Ferrari AJ, Degenhardt L, Feigin V, Vos T. The global burden of mental, neurological and substance use disorders: an analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. PLoS One 2015; 10(2): e0116820.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
CDC centers opioid overdose data. The drug overdose epidemic: Behind the numbers. [Online] Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/ drugoverdose/data/index.html. [Accessed on June 7, 2020].  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Schaulis MD, Snoey ER. Three years, a thousand visits: a case study of the ultimate frequent flyer. Ann Emerg Med 2001; 38(1): 87-89.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Longo LP, Parran Jr T, Johnson B, Kinsey W. Addiction: Part II. Identification and management of the drug-seeking patient. Am Fam Physician 2000; 61(8): 2401-2408.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Meisel ZF, Lupulescu-Mann N, Charlesworth CJ, Kim H, Sun BC. Conversion to persistent or high-risk opioid use after a new prescription from the emergency department: evidence from Washington Medicaid beneficiaries. Ann Emerg Med 2019; 74(5): 611-621.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Smith MW, Stocks C, Santora PB. Hospital readmission rates and emergency department visits for mental health and substance abuse conditions. Community Ment Health J 2015; 51(2): 190-197.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Şebnem EÇ, Onur Y, Tuba CÖ, Özlem G. Acil Serviste Akut Ağrı Tedavisinde Opioid Kullanimi. [Online] Available from: https:// dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/smj/issue/11341/135547. [Accessed on June 7, 2020].  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Drug Abuse Warning Network. Highlights of the 2010 drug abuse warning network (DAWN) findings on drug-related emergency department visits. [Online] Available from: https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/DAWN096/DAWN096/SR096EDHighlights2010.htm. [Accessed on April 19, 2015].  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Results from the 2011 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of national findings. [Online] Available from: https://www.samhsa. gov/data/sites/default/files/Revised2k11NSDUHSummNatFindings/ Revised2k11NSDUHSummNatFindings/NSDUHresults2011.htm. [Accessed on June 7, 2020].  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
United States Department of Justice. Facts about prescription drug diversion and abuse. [Online] Avaliable from: http://www.justice.gov/ dea/pubs/ pressrel/pr052009.html. [Accessed January 5, 2014].  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Shah A, Hayes CJ, Martin BC. Characteristics of initial prescription episodes and likelihood of long-term opioid use-United States, 2006-2015. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2017; 66(10): 265-269.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Ferari CS, Katsevman GA, Dekeseredy P, Sedney GL. Implications of drug use disorders on spine surgery. World Neurosurg 2020; 136: e334-341.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Carmichael AN, Morgan L, Del Fabbro E. Identifying and assessing the risk of opioid abuse in patients with cancer: an integrative review. Subst Abuse Rehabil 2016; 7: 71-79.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Levy B, Paulozzi L, Mack KA, Jones CM. Trends in opioid analgesic-prescribing rates by specialty, U.S., 2007-2012. Am J Prev Med 2015; 49(3): 409-413.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Baldemı R, Akçaboy EY, Çelık Ş, Noyan Ö, Akçaboy ZN, Baydar M. An assessment of physicians attitudes toward opioid usage and opiophobia: Results of a survey from a training and research hospital. Agri 2019; 31(1): 23-31.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Edlund MJ, Steffick D, Hudson T, Harris KM, Sullivan M. Risk factors for clinically recognized opioid abuse and dependence among veterans using opioids for chronic non-cancer pain. Pain 2007; 129(3): 355-362.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Hudson TJ, Edlund MJ, Steffick DE, Tripathi SP, Sullivan MD. Epidemiology of regular prescribed opioid use: results from a national, population-based survey. J Pain Sympt Mgmt 2008; 36(3): 280-288.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Kiang MV, Basu S, Chen J, Alexander MJ. Assessment of changes in the geographical distribution of opioid-related mortality across the United States by opioid type, 1999-2016. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2(2): e190040.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Sun EC, Darnall BD, Baker LC, Mackey S. Incidence of and risk factors for chronic opioid use among opioid-naive patients in the postoperative period. JAMA Intern Med 2016; 176(9): 1286-1293.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Brummett CM, Waljee JF, Goesling J, Stephanie Moser, Paul Lin, Englesbe MJ, et al. New persistent opioid use after minor and major surgical procedures in US adults. JAMA Surg 2017; 152(6): e170504.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Sekhri S, Arora NS, Cottrell H, Baerg T, Duncan A, Hu HM, et al. Probability of opioid prescription refilling after surgery: Does initial prescription dose matter? Ann Surg 2018; 268(2): 271-276.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Edlund MJ, Martin BC, Fan MY, Devries A, Braden JB, Sullivan MD. Risks for opioid abuse and dependence among recipients of chronic opioid therapy: results from the TROUP study. Drug Alcohol Depend 2010; 112(1-2): 90-98.  Back to cited text no. 23
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Patients and ...
3. Results
4. Discussion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed246    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded49    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal